« Modern Tools for Modern Media Relations: An Introduction (Part 1 of 3) | Main | Modern Media Tools for Modern Media Relations - Podcasting Part 3 of 3 »

June 09, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c0e169e200d83425b95953ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Modern Tools for Modern Media Relations - Really Simple Syndication Part 2 (of 3):

» Media Relations Perspective on RSS from Kevin Poor
Linda Zimmer at ZNetLady has a nice post on how media relations professionals should be thinking about RSS. As we go through the process at Dix & Eaton of getting our clients to think RSS, it is good to have... [Read More]

Comments

yinka olaito

I may need further advice or RSS usage. Though I have it installed by SEO expert, I am yet to full understand it full use> Can someone throw more light?

Linda Zimmer

Thanks, Bill, for reading and commenting.

To answer your question, you are correct in saying that it allows journalists to “segment” their activities and get well-organized content delivered to their desktops, avoiding “messier” email – or unsolicited email.

But from a PR standpoint, RSS also causes content that might otherwise go undiscovered to be “found” by a journalist. Although that's just one of its benefits.

However, it does benefit search engine marketing hugely. The reasons are many, but I’ll just mention two here to keep it brief.

You cannot theorize that each individual post is “low” in importance and therefore can’t impact your rankings. Search engines are looking for RSS feeds to track newly updated pages/content. They index feeds more often than “regular” content. In addition, if there is an increase in the rate of updated content, this also “scores” favorably with Google, for example. This is because in addition to it being attractive as “fresh content” that page may generate lots of inbound links because of the RSS feed, and/or, it may prove a popular link (clicks) once it has been indexed - also factors in creating “importance.” What’s really interesting, by the way, is you can use RSS to boost optimization of even static content by including keyword-targeted feeds on your webpage.

Another search engine implication is there are 50 or 60 search engines that use RSS feeds almost exclusively to index content. If you don’t have an RSS feed, you aren’t in them at all.

RSS and search engine optimization is pretty broad topic, and I caution you not to narrow your optimization efforts to the inbound link theory. RSS is actually changing the way search engines rank pages. We definitely need to be looking to RSS if the search engines are.

Bill Mitchell

Great article. So, correct me if I'm wrong here...

In PR, it appears the primary value of RSS is to let journalists segment their activity. Rather than look through a huge bin full of email, they now can actively join RSS feeds, and check new, well-organized content at their own leisure. As a result, they are more likely to read what we have written.

This mechanism usually wouldn't benefit search engine marketing in the narrow sense: that is, the process of arranging for valuable external links to point to your own site, so as to increase the importance of your own site. The reason is that the rank of each individual posting is very low.

Is that correct?

Lisa Williams

This is a nice intro to RSS.

The comments to this entry are closed.