SL Business Communicators met in-world today hosted by Edelman at Edelman Island. Gary Goldhammer (aka G24khamr Goodfellow) of Edelman Interactive Solutions was our host; with Mary Ellen Gordon (aka Pebbles Hannya) of Market Truths. Pebbles shared insights from the Market Truths' recent Brand study and G24khamr spoke (too) briefly about his view of SL and the business plan competition Edelman sponsored several months ago.
We had a most engaged group, although our time went by much too fast. Many thanks to both G24K and Pebbles for a great meeting! G24K, we need to meet with you again!
The transcript of our meeting follows.
Welcome and Introductions:
[12:07] ZnetLady: Welcome to the SLBC meeting here at Edelman Island. We have G24Khamr here from Edelman Interactive Solutions and Pebbles Hannya from Market Truths. G24khamr is Gary Goldhammer, VP of Edelman Interactive Solutions. Pebbles is Mary Ellen Gordon, founder of Market Truths, a RL market research company who has expanded their services into virtual worlds market research.
ZnetLady: As promised, Pebbles is going to give us some insights into the Brand perception report her company, Market Truths recently completed. G24khamr and Pebbles will also discuss the business plan competition. You may recall that Market Truths won that competition and I'm hoping we get some insight into the initiative as well as what it has meant to Market Truths so far.
ZnetLady: We will open the floor to questions - and I have a couple that people already submitted.
ZnetLady: I think we'll let Pebbles discuss the brand study and then we'll give G24K the floor.
ZnetLady: Pebbles? Please take it away.
Pebbles Hannya / Mary Ellen Gordon, Market Truths
Thank you Znetlady.
To begin, we’ve all heard concerns about brands having their images tarnished in some way as a result of being here, but our results suggest that while there are definitely SL residents who are opposed to the whole concept of RL brands being present in SL, overall, being present within SL seems to be helping the RL reputation of brands rather than hurting them.
For example…
as Znetlady said in the Business Communicator’s blog a week or two ago, we found that nearly half (49%) of the SL residents we surveyed view the current presence of RL brands in SL as being more positive than negative overall, and another third (34%) have a neutral attitude.
Fewer than one in five (17%) view the current presence of RL brands in SL as being more negative than positive.
SL residents have both hopes and fears about what the entry of more RL brands might mean to SL. On the positive side, they expect them to bring publicity, resources, and credibility to SL, and they expect that their presence will cause SL infrastructure to improve and make SL look and feel more realistic.
On the negative side, they fear that RL brands will receive preferential treatment from Linden Lab, put upward pressure on land prices, cause SL to become more regulated, and harm small content creators.
In the focus groups we did, that last point, about the potential for RL brands to “squeeze out” small content creators, was one that came up a lot.
In addition to considering RL brands in general, we also looked at the perceptions SL residents have of the SL presence of particular brands. Of course, to even have a perception, you need to be aware that a brand is represented here in some way, and the brands that had the greatest (unaided) awareness were IBM and Adidas.
One of the things that is perhaps most interesting about the awareness data we collected is that several of the brands that rated among the top 21 in terms of awareness had no official SL presence at the time we conducted the survey – they were being “represented” by fakes, knock-offs, etc.
Interestingly, one of those was Coca-Cola, which tied with Reuters for 5th place in terms of awareness. As we’ve heard this week, Coke is now creating an official SL presence, but what’s noteworthy about all of those brands with an unofficial presence is that even their unofficial representation is having a positive impact on RL brand perceptions.
We looked at attitudes towards brands that are represented here in SL (either officially or unofficially) in two ways – both in terms of residents’ impressions of the SL presence of the brand, and the effect that SL presence has had on their overall attitude toward the RL brand.
Reuters scored most highly on both of those measures, but once again there was a surprise in the sense that an unofficially represented brand — in this case Apple — also did well. Apple was third on both measures, following Nissan in terms of attitudes toward their SL presence, and NBC in terms of the effect of the SL presence on RL brand attitudes.
The brands receiving the most benefit from their SL presence are those that are perceived to be making a contribution to SL, and doing that in a way that links to their RL product or service.
In addition to looking at what brands ARE doing in SL, we also investigated what they COULD do.
As you can see here (1 is bad, 5 is good), tactics that result in a deterioration in brand attitudes are SL variants of traditional one-way communication. (Ads in notecards and IMs are seen as the SL equivalent of spam.)
Tactics that score well are those that link RL and SL and also create opportunities for interaction between the company and the customer.
The blue bars in the graph represent how respondents would feel about a brand toward which they have a favorable attitude (but is not currently represented in SL) undertaking a particular tactic, whereas the white represents how they would feel about a brand that they have a more neutral attitude toward undertaking the tactic. As you can see, most tactics are viewed more favorably when undertaken by brands that are already viewed favorably.
Often the neutral brands were fast moving consumer goods (e.g., things you buy in grocery stores), whereas the favorite brands tended to be higher involvement type products (e.g., cars, clothes, electronics), so that’s likely to be part of the reason for the difference. A topic that came up in the focus groups was what point would there be for lower involvement type products to be represented within SL.
Given these results, it seems clear that if such lower involvement brands do want to create an effective SL presence they will need to work harder to establish their relevance in this environment. That’s both because they start at a disadvantage, and because their RL marketing mixes often lean toward the tactics that don’t work well in this environment so to be successful they may need to be willing to experiment with new approaches.
That’s a brief summary of what’s in the report. I’ve brought a notecard dispenser so you can grab a notecard with the table of contents and executive summary if you want to. The full report is available for sale in our SL office and on our Web site (http://sl.markettruths.com).
Q&A
[12:21] Anthony Reisman: May I ask a question?
[12:22] Pebbles Hannya: Znetlady, did you want time for questions about the report now, or do you want to leave them until after G24 has finished?
[12:22] ZnetLady: Yes, let's take some questions.
[12:22] ZnetLady: Go ahead Anthony
[12:22] Pebbles Hannya: Sure, you first then Anthony. What was your question?
[12:23] Anthony Reisman: Was there any relationship noticed between the amount of money spent versus product attitude or is it mostly based on the actions taken/
[12:23] Pebbles Hannya: Money spent by the brand you mean? In terms of the cost of their presence here?
[12:23] Anthony Reisman: Yes.
[12:24] Pebbles Hannya: Well, I didn't have access to the cost of each build, but if you just look at what the brands are doing here there does seem to be a relationship.
[12:24] Anthony Reisman: Ok, thank you.
[12:24] Pebbles Hannya: For example, IBM had the greatest awareness and it has multiple islands.
[12:25] Jolanda RiversRunRed: heelo eeryone
[12:25] Pebbles Hannya: Reuters scored most highly in terms of its SL presence, and it has people devoted to SL full time.
[12:25] ZnetLady: Metamo posed a question earlier: A blue-sky question: For the moment, assume that technical limitations can be surmounted. What might be an ideal scenario for RL/SL branding, given Market Truths' perception that the best brand efforts integrate both?
[12:25] JimmyJet Fossett: So a correlation if a facility is manned with AV helpers??
[12:26] Anthony Reisman: Yes, but I wonder about the awarness gain they've recieved (by putting in millions) compared to say someone who put in small fraction of that.
[12:26] Pebbles Hannya: To JimmyJet's question first -- we looked at that specifically in our women's clothing report, and people did say they would be more likely to buy from stores that did have "real" sales people present.
[12:26] Pebbles Hannya: Now to Metamo's question...
[12:26] Hermione Watanabe: i agree with that
[12:27] G24khamr Goodfellow: Anthony, I think it depends on goal a bit -- personally, I think there is better long-term to gain by going small and making real connections with the community
[12:27] Pebbles Hannya: In terms of the ideal scenario, I really think it's linking between the two places.
[12:27] Pebbles Hannya: My pet example in this regard is Lands End.
[12:27] Pebbles Hannya: As some people might know, Lands End uses a virtual model on their regular Web site.
[12:28] Pebbles Hannya: You can try clothes on your virtual model (who is an avatar with your proportions, skin and hair color -- sort of anyway).
[12:29] Pebbles Hannya: If that model looked even more like you, and you could try on, customize clothes here, keep a virtual "closet" of RL clothes you've bought from them, etc., I think that would be fantastic and really illustrate that idea of blending SL and RL.
[12:29] ZnetLady: Terrapin Writer has a question.
[12:29] Terrapin Writer: The interesting question to me is - what is the real world impact of a successful experience here. For example, a cool Nissan Sentra dispenser doesn't really make me want to go check out that car. Arfe there any examples yet of real real life impact of success in SL?
[12:30] Estaban Graves: Has anyone considered teh SL presence of Coldwell banker yet?
[12:30] Pebbles Hannya: With regard to Anthony's point, I agree with G24 -- it depends on the objective.
[12:30] Pebbles Hannya: Purely in terms of awarenss, spending more does seem to help (but not without creativity, a clear idea of what you're trying to achieve, etc.).
[12:31] Pebbles Hannya: But awareness may not be the key objective for every business, so I think as with everything, the key is to start with the objective and then work backwards to see what resources are needed to achieve that objective.
[12:31] Anthony Reisman: Ok, thank you.
[12:32] Pebbles Hannya: With regard to Terrapin's question, I think it also comes back to the objective.
[12:33] Pebbles Hannya: If the objective is, for example, to get you to buy a car, then I think it's true that no car company here is achieving that (not yet anyway)...
[12:33] Pebbles Hannya: but if it's something like changing brand attitudes, I think that is possible.
[12:33] Pebbles Hannya: For example, to pick up on the Nissan example, I think what they've done probably is effective at getting across particular attributes of the car (I'm thinking here of Altima island not the Sentra vending machine).
[12:34] Pebbles Hannya: Because to figure out what those gadgets do you need to read the information which also gives you a message about car attributes (in a fun way).
[12:34] G24khamr Goodfellow: Like anything, it comes down to strategy. Simply coming into SL or any virtual world is not a strategy. It's also not a passive enterprise, like traditional web sites. This is something I think companies are struggling with.
[12:34] Pebbles Hannya: So if their objective is to let people know that model of car has those particular attributes (which perhaps people didn't expect), then I suspect they are achieving that.
[12:35] ZnetLady: Estaban asks: Has anyone considered teh SL presence of Coldwell banker yet?
[12:35] Terrapin Writer: I like what they're doing
[12:35] G24khamr Goodfellow: Pebbles, can you talk about Tango and H&R Block? that to me seemed like a great integration of online/offline.
[12:36] Pebbles Hannya: Both Caldwell Banker and H&R block were too new to feature in our report, so I haven't looked at either of those in much detail.
[12:36] Albert Falck: I see
[12:37] Pebbles Hannya: With regard to H&R block, I think it comes back to some of the questions and points that were raised at our last meeting...
[12:37] Pebbles Hannya: ... if they can contribute something here, like offering the types of advice that is likely to be important to people in SL (cross border issues, virtual employees, etc.)
[12:37] Pebbles Hannya: ... then I think it is a really good example.
[12:37] ZnetLady: Albert has a question.
[12:38] Albert Falck: yes
[12:38] Albert Falck: Did you find any difference in the perception between companies trying to create services for SL (for example reuters, or coldwell bancker), and others coming for promotion of their brands or RL products?
[12:38] ZnetLady: Albert - and then we'll go go G24K for a bit.
[12:38] Pebbles Hannya: Well, in terms of resident attitudes, people are really looking for the companies to make a contribution and interact with them insome way -- not just tell them stuff.
[12:39] Pebbles Hannya: So in that sense, those who are creating services are likely to be perceived more positively.
[12:39] Albert Falck: I see tks
[12:39] Pebbles Hannya: It would be possible to make a contribution with promotion only, but as you will have noticed from that graphic I showed, some traditional forms of promotion -- basically straight advertising, just don't go over well here.
[12:40] Pebbles Hannya: OK, so at this point, I'll turn it over to G24...
[12:40] Albert Falck: Yes I see
G24Khamr Goodfellow / Gary Goldhammer, Edelman Interactive Solutions
[12:40] ZnetLady: Can we call on G24K of Edelman? We can take more questions.
[12:40] ZnetLady: In a few minutes.
[12:40] G24khamr Goodfellow: sure!
[12:41] G24khamr Goodfellow: I just have a few comments. First of all, thanks to Pebbles for the great overview. As many of you know, Pebbles was the winner of our business plan contest, and she jsut showed you a big reason why.
[12:41] Albert Falck: :-)
Like Pebbles, I believe that SL has great potential for brands, but only if those brands integrate with the community as well as with their RL strategies and focus.
And with regard to Second Life in particular, I think we also need to counsel companies to not just look at SL, but at 3d environments in general.
[12:43] ZnetLady: G - stand up so we can see you!
[12:43] G24khamr Goodfellow: SL represents a shift, a trend toward where the web is going in general -- to more community minded, immersive environments. So being in a world like SL has great impact and importance for how interaction will occur on the internet as a whole, not just in worlds like SL>
[12:44] Estaban Graves: oh - he's the guy maincally typing away over there...
[12:44] G24khamr Goodfellow: sorry! That better?
[12:44] ZnetLady: Yeah!
[12:45] G24khamr Goodfellow: What I also like about SL, as you can see if you go to my blog (http://belowthefold.typepad.com), is that I get to have hair :-)
[12:45] ZnetLady: So G, what was the purpose with Edelman sponsoring the biz plan competition?
[12:46] G24khamr Goodfellow: As for Edelman's role, I would like to see us do more with the community, such as with contests like the business plan. I'd like to see us get "off our island" as well.
The purpose was in some sense to come into SL with something more than a simple "we're here." but in a larger sense it was to connect with the business community and explore the possibilities of this space. This is a place of very creative people, many of whom will help build the next generation internet I referenced earlier.
I'm also curious as to what people think of The Grid Review. Are these kinds of shows valuable to the community? Do they give a good impression of SL? These are issues I'm focused on, among others.
[12:49] ZnetLady: Is anyone familiar with the Grid Review here?
[12:49] JimmyJet Fossett: Yes
[12:49] ZnetLady: Thoughts?
[12:49] Carbonel Tigereye nods emphatically.
[12:50] Estaban Graves: yes - watched the current epidose today before this event
[12:50] Anthony Reisman: I've heard about it, but haven't seen it yet.
[12:50] Basba Babenco: I have seen abit
[12:50] Estaban Graves: not sure if it is speaking to the business community
[12:50] Maryrose Mariani: Turn on your movie control and you'll see it
[12:50] JimmyJet Fossett: Great production, may appeal to a certain demo only
[12:50] Carbonel Tigereye watches it on his portable MP3 player when stuck in line or trapped in an airplane.
[12:50] Basba Babenco: agree
[12:50] Estaban Graves: agreed Jimmy
[12:50] JimmyJet Fossett: Aw shucks ;-)
[12:51] Estaban Graves: the production values might need to be a bit stronger to draw in the business community
[12:51] G24khamr Goodfellow: I'd appreciate your feedback. We are exploring how best to engage our SL presence...
[12:51] Lora Rasmuson: what is grid review?
[12:51] G24khamr Goodfellow: Agree -- it's the business audience I'm interested in.
[12:51] Terrapin Writer: Gatherings like this are great - just to see other people. Most brand spaces are ghost towns most of the time
[12:52] G24khamr Goodfellow: It's a weekly machinima "news show" about what happening in SL. Very funny, quick and cute.
[12:52] Estaban Graves: me too - it's the business community that HAS to find SL as a viable venue for connecting to the Web2.0 audience
[12:52] G24khamr Goodfellow: yeah, like this space -- it's nice to have company over :-)
[12:52] Lora Rasmuson: where do you get that?
[12:52] Estaban Graves: LOL - have a BBQ!!
[12:52] ZnetLady: YUM
[12:53] G24khamr Goodfellow: thegridreview.com
[12:53] Carbonel Tigereye thinks about the fact that most of the hip nightclubs in New York are empty more often than not.
[12:53] ZnetLady: Pebbles, would you comment about what the business plan win has meant for Market Truths?
[12:53] G24khamr Goodfellow: and be nice ;-)
[12:53] ZnetLady: hee - this is an open forum.
[12:54] Pebbles Hannya: Sure. For us it has had several benefits already.
[12:55] Pebbles Hannya: For one thing, we found the process really useful. I think it's important in any business to take a step back every now and then to look at the big picture...
[12:55] Pebbles Hannya: ... I think that's probably even more important in SL given how quickly things are changing, but also probably even more tempting to skip for the same reason since there are so many day to day things to do...
[12:56] Pebbles Hannya: The contest gave us external dates to work to to do that sort of a review, and those coincided with times it would have been good for us to that anyway.
[12:56] Pebbles Hannya: Secondly, it was useful in terms of getting feedback -- from people who understand both business in general and SL in particular...
[12:57] Pebbles Hannya: ... that was a great reality check for making sure we were on the right track and not overlooking something obvious because we were too close to the situation.
[12:57] Pebbles Hannya: Third, it really gave us a boost in terms of publicity...
[12:58] Pebbles Hannya: We had a huge spike in traffic to our Web site right after the contest, and continue to get media and potential client inquiries as a result.
[12:58] Pebbles Hannya: Last but not least, the prizes were good too, but I think it's too soon to really assess the full impact of those.
[12:59] ZnetLady: Thanks, Pebbles.
[12:59] ZnetLady: Before we start to wrap up I have another question about the research.
[12:59] G24khamr Goodfellow: Of course one of those prizes is working with me, which is priceless :-)
[12:59] ZnetLady: But first, I'd like to mention that Pebbles and I will be presenting tomorrow
[12:59] Pebbles Hannya: Indeed :))
[12:59] ZnetLady: At the ITE conference on Silicon Island.
[13:00] Estaban Graves: reagrding Silicon Island
[13:00] ZnetLady: Stop by - we will be going into more depth on the report and I'll be talking a bit about the implications for
[13:00] Estaban Graves: I understand access is restricted?
[13:00] ZnetLady: marketers.
[13:00] Anthony Reisman: It's open to everyone now.
[13:00] Estaban Graves: ty
[13:01] Anthony Reisman: They are limiting the number of people to about 80 though, (74 are there when I checked earlier).
[13:01] ZnetLady: It is a great conference - a way too for businesses to connect with in world talent / technologists.
[13:01] Basba Babenco: That is great!
[13:01] Albert Falck: good
[13:02] ZnetLady: Carbonel has a questions about the market study. Go CT.
[13:02] Carbonel Tigereye: Thanks, Znetlady
[13:02] Carbonel Tigereye: Pebbles, Thank you for sharing your important research findings with us! I was wondering if you could explain the sampling methods used for both your survey and the focus groups. Were there any intrinsic limitations of SL-based research that you had to overcome when designing and implementing the surveys and the focus groups? Are there any methodological caveats or limitations that we should mention to our clients when sharing your findings?
[13:02] Pebbles Hannya: Good questions CT....
[13:03] Pebbles Hannya: Participants for both the survey and the focus groups were selected from our research panel.
[13:03] Pebbles Hannya: That is limited to people who have been in SL for at least 30 days and have verified accounts...
[13:03] Carbonel Tigereye nods.
[13:04] Pebbles Hannya: therefore, one caveat is the results may not apply to newbies (we don't include newbies because 1) the SL population is too transient, and 2) they are too new to have formed stable opinions about things here).
[13:04] Hermione Watanabe: what counts as a newbie?
[13:04] Estaban Graves: any data on the transient nature of the SL [population? churn? etc.
[13:04] ZnetLady: under 30 days Hermione
[13:04] Pebbles Hannya: There are SL issues that we need to consider in designing research methodology, but those things would not affect the results.
[13:05] Hermione Watanabe: thank you
[13:05] Lora Rasmuson: How big is the panel/
[13:05] Pebbles Hannya: Well, the data that Linden Lab has released previously suggest that only about 10% of people who sign up for SL stay.
[13:05] Estaban Graves: 90% churn...
[13:05] Pebbles Hannya: I haven't seen any more detailed break down of that in terms of how many register one avatar, discard it and come back with an alt, etc.
[13:05] Carbonel Tigereye wonders how many people were surveyed for the big report, and how many people were in the focus groups.
[13:06] Pebbles Hannya: Or any data to see if that percentage is changing.
[13:06] Estaban Graves: and data below that? 1 week, 2 weeks, etc?
[13:06] Lora Rasmuson: You recruit from your panel for focus groups, etc. How many people on the panel?
[13:06] Pebbles Hannya: No, we've actually tried to get Linden Lab as a client because we would love to look into that (and the reasons for it) for them, but so far, no luck :(
[13:06] Basba Babenco: Do they know how many of those 10% are rl business related?
[13:06] Albert Falck: LOL
[13:07] ZnetLady: Can we pause one second and thank G24K? He has to leave but he says we can stay around and chat.
[13:07] ZnetLady: /clap
[13:07] Pebbles Hannya: No Basba, I've never seen that data broken down in any way (use, demographics, etc.).
[13:07] Carbonel Tigereye: /claps enthusiastically.
[13:07] Petuel Prieto: thx G24K
[13:07] G24khamr Goodfellow: Our island is your island -- thanks everyone!
[13:07] Jolanda RiversRunRed: /clap
[13:07] Carbonel Tigereye claps again.
[13:07] ZnetLady: Thanks G24K for hosting us here at Edleman Island
[13:07] Albert Falck: tks G24k
[13:07] JimmyJet Fossett: Thanks G24K
[13:07] G24khamr Goodfellow: Wish me luck in the RL of LA's freeways :-)
[13:07] Pebbles Hannya: Lora there are a couple of other panels in SL, so for competitive reasons we don't reveal the number of panelists we have...
[13:07] Adri Saarinen applauds!
[13:08] Anthony Reisman: Thanks G24k
[13:08] Pebbles Hannya: We can tell clients how big a sample we can give them for a given project because it's actually quite complex...
[13:08] G24khamr Goodfellow: you are all very welcome! bye!
[13:08] Carbonel Tigereye raises his hand.
[13:09] Pebbles Hannya: ... in addition to considering the overall size of the panel, that is determined by things such as the categories people opt in or out for, response rates, the number of projects we have going and the number of times we've done research on similar topics....
[13:09] Pebbles Hannya: Yes CT?
[13:09] Lora Rasmuson: Thank you, Pebbles. Do you profile the people demographically when they join your panel?
[13:10] Pebbles Hannya: Yes, we do -- and match our demographics to those LL releases for SL as a whole.
[13:10] Carbonel Tigereye: Is it possible to find out the number of respondents for the report that you recently released? The basic n? I mean, without giving away strategic information, of course.
[13:10] Pebbles Hannya: Sure, usable responses was 201 (after reliability and validity checks).
[13:11] Carbonel Tigereye smiles. Awesome, thanks!
[13:11] ZnetLady: What is interesting, is that I just got the results of another study done by the French research company here in Sl
[13:11] ZnetLady: And they *directly* correspond to the MT report.
[13:12] ZnetLady: They used different methodology
[13:12] ZnetLady: and a different sample size - and the results are almost identical.
[13:12] ZnetLady: Do we have any more questions?
[13:13] Carbonel Tigereye wonders when Znet and Pebbles are presenting tomorrow.
[13:13] ZnetLady: Pebble you have a notecard for everyone , yes?
[13:13] ZnetLady: We are presenign at 5:00 pm LST
[13:13] ZnetLady: SLT
[13:13] ZnetLady: wow I messed that up.
[13:13] Pebbles Hannya: Oh yes, sorry I took it away so people could see the screen, but I will put it back.
[13:13] Estaban Graves: LOL
[13:13] Estaban Graves: so then where and when?
[13:13] Estaban Graves: anf you have landmark cards?
[13:14] ZnetLady: Another questions from Basba: How do you handle cultural differences in branding/PR/ advertisement in SL?
[13:14] Pebbles Hannya: Just touch the report on the podium to get the notecard.
[13:14] Estaban Graves: ohh great question...
[13:14] Pebbles Hannya: It includes the contents, executive summary, and information about how to get the full version.
[13:15] Real Life Brands in Second Life (Q1 2007) + ES gave you Real Life Brands in Second Life (Q1 2007) + ES.
[13:15] Albert Falck: yes really good
[13:16] Pebbles Hannya: Well, we have been looking to see if we find country-based differences in all of the reports we've done so far.
[13:16] Estaban Graves: how does a Babbler figure into internationalization?
[13:16] ZnetLady: Pebbles is typing away :-)
[13:16] Pebbles Hannya: So far, there have been surprisingly few, but I think where we will start to see them is if / when companies do start offering more representation as part of their SL presence rather than the current self service type model.
[13:16] Estaban Graves: go pebbles, go
[13:17] Estaban Graves: english seems to be the predominante language
[13:17] Pebbles Hannya: Well, so far we have been doing all of our work in English (which is why it's particularly gratifying that the French study gave a similar result).
[13:17] Estaban Graves: but in the social media world, enlish is not #1
[13:18] Estaban Graves: let me see if i can find that stat
[13:18] Pebbles Hannya: Babbler (I prefer Babel Fish myself) will come in, I think, if companies do try to use more live service people.
[13:18] ZnetLady: True, Estaban, but I think different cultures have different expectations about interaction with brands - customer service for example
[13:18] Pebbles Hannya: There are just so many languages spoken here, and between that and the 24/7 nature of SL it's going to be a challenge to provide good customer service here if that's what companies want to do.
Wrap Up
[13:19] ZnetLady: We are going to wrap up the formal meeting here.
[13:19] Carbonel Tigereye suspects that companies like Sony are a great model for multilingual, transnational service.
[13:19] ZnetLady: Thank you Pebbles SOO much for the great information and for the executive summary.
[13:19] ZnetLady: I will post the transcript later today.
[13:19] Carbonel Tigereye: Thank you, Pebbles!
[13:19] Adri Saarinen applauds!
[13:19] JimmyJet Fossett: Thanks Pebbles and Znet
[13:19] Albert Falck: tks pebbles!
[13:19] Anthony Reisman: Thank you!
[13:19] Estaban Graves: hmm - can't find the stat
[13:20] Basba Babenco: /applauds
[13:20] Pebbles Hannya: Thanks everyone :)
General Networking Ensues...
April 20, 2007
Recent Comments