« Reviewing Second Life in 2006 | Main | Virtual Fireplace, Real Warmth »

Two Sides of the Second-Life-for-Marketers Coin

Waves_007 Waves.  You know, they swell, hit the shore and then they recede.

The Second-Life-for-Marketers debate feels like that.  Waves of "second life is the new now thing" hit with the requisite response/undercurrent of "oh, it is SO not."

It's been fun, frequently amusing, sometimes irritating - and the vehemence is more than a little baffling. 

A month ago Horace Clutterbuck's real world persona wrote on the Churbuck.com blog 10 reasons why he didn't like Second Life for marketing.  It garnered its share of comments and blog responses.  But, with every ounce of me, I hope you read Giff Constable's blog post response to 9 of Horace's ten points (one was about Horace's dislike of being pitched - n.a.) 

I wish we could all calm down a bit about Second Life.  But the stridency of the pundits tells me there must be something to Second Life (which to me is a stand-in for "virtual worlds"), so calm is unlikely.  The jockeying for position tells me there is opportunity here, so those swells will get higher.

The trend I think I'm seeing: those on the "oh it is SO not" side are looking at "now" - as in today, in this exact moment, give-it-to-me.  Those on the "new now thing" side, they are taking a longer view of "now" - as in where-we-are-heading, progress, what-we-need-to-be-learning-about now.

Giff deftly points out - everyone is right.   

December 29, 2006

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c0e169e200d8342dcff053ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Two Sides of the Second-Life-for-Marketers Coin:

» LOTD: January 3rd from Open The Dialogue
Just like everyone else I'm struggling to catch up from a long weekend. The New York Times has hired Rebecca Dana away from the New York Observer to report on the new media industry for their business section. Dana just... [Read More]

Comments

The problem is that some people try to build their credibility by destroying the credibility of others - which is where the vehemence comes in.

Reasonable discussion - and there is reasonable discussion - is often ignored simply because Howard Stern isn't involved. :-)

How true that is, unfortunately, Taran.

It does seem the reasonable discussion is largely ignored. In my wondering moments I ask if it is because it takes more of a time investment? It far more exciting, however (to me, at least). There you find the real thinkers of our day. Challenges to every way of thinking is also there, yet somehow it diminishes no one and enriches everyone.

By the way, Giff Constable is always found in those discussions.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Join the Second Life Group

Our group is focused on business communications in SL. Get group notices of our in-world events as well as special Second Life information or announcements. Search Groups in Second Life for "SL Business Communicators." Click Join. You're in!"

VW Strategy Quip of the Day


follow ZnetLady at http://twitter.com

Virtual Linda

SL Avatar Name: ZnetLady Isbell
Email me
Wiki: SLBC Wiki
Website: MarCom:Interactive
Skype: ZnetLady

Second Life Blogs